Dating debate questions Free nsa chat websites with no subscribing
For those cynics amongst you who dare to doubt my clinical objectivity, here are the results of an independent study published in New Scientist Magazine. THE world is divided into “dog people” and “cat people”, each passionately believing that their preferred pet is superior.Until a decade ago, there was very little scientific evidence either camp could muster to support its claims.Help us reduce the maintenance cost of our online services.Because your computer is running an older version of internet browser, it no longer meets the features of modern websites.Veith believes that the theory of evolution does not provide a plausible explanation of our origins.His findings are also available on DVD or online through Amazing Discoveries™.However, there is one anatomical measure that gives a pretty good indication of information processing capacity: the number of neurons in the cortex, or executive brain.Here cats trounce dogs, with 300 million neurons compared with a piddling 160 million (, vol 9, p 250).
If instead you measure brain mass as a percentage of body mass, cats win by a whisker. In general, smaller mammals have slightly larger brains relative to their body size than bigger ones.This means cats’ brains are exactly the mass you would expect for their size, whereas dogs have slightly more upstairs than you would predict. That is perhaps all to the good, because brain size is not a reliable measureof intelligence.In fact, if you want to assess smarts you are far better looking at behaviour than crude neuroanatomy – more on that later.Every pet-owner knows their furry family member is special – a unique being with its own talents and foibles.Yet scientific research tends to look at species as a whole and deals in averages and trends when attempting to quantify their characteristics.