Virginia separation dating
There is no authority to be cited in Virginia that should make a spousal support candidate feel secure that he or she can commit post-separation adultery without consequences. But Judge Chamblin granted the husband a divorce based on the wife's adultery, and declined to invoke the manifest injustice exception, explaining as follows: I understand present society and the need for companionship, but there is also dignity and reverence in the institution of marriage.... The Husband's actions may have contributed to the failure of the marriage, but that did not give the Wife the right to commit adultery, deceive the Husband, and continue to collect support from him.
is a Circuit court case, it provides a cautionary illustration of the public policy of Virginia regarding post-separation adultery.
But suffice it to say that whether manifest injustice dictates that the adulterous spouse may still receive spousal support is a case-by-case determination which is made based upon the unique facts of each case.The Court's rationale was that:the statutorily mandated waiting period..designed primarily to give the parties an opportunity to reconcile and determine if they desire the separation to be final.The commission of adultery during that period by either party to a marriage in trouble is the one act most likely to frustrate and prevent reconciliation.The legal term for representing yourself is "pro se," pronounced "pro say") which is Latin for "on your own behalf." Representing yourself is not a good idea for everyone.It is important to understand that by representing yourself, you may be giving up important rights.