When it comes to gender differences and dating
And in virtually all cases the small, average—and often decreasing—difference between the sexes is greatly exceeded by the amount of variability on that trait within members of each sex. The Discarded Image: An Introduction to Medieval and Renaissance Literature. But that prejudice may cause parents to unconsciously limit their daughter's physical activity.
Most of the “bell curves” for women and men (showing the distribution of a given psychological trait or behavior) overlap almost completely. Lewis and Carl Jung as it does to their currently most visible descendent, John Gray, who continues to claim (with no systematic empirical warrant) that men are from Mars and women are from Venus (Gray 1992). How we perceive children—sociable or remote, physically bold or reticent—shapes how we treat them and therefore what experiences we give them.
In a more recent study, researchers examined the preferences of college students participating in a speed-dating event. And that when independent observers who were unaware of the parents beliefs rated the children's clothes as masculine or feminine the ratings showed that the boys and girls in both types of families were dressed according to gender norms.
Prior to their speed-dates, the students rated how important different characteristics would be in making their selections, and the expected gender differences emerged, with women rating physical attractiveness as less important than men. Much early research on gender differences in mating actually supports this myth. She explains that the mothers who were committed to gender equality however saw their children's clothes as less gender-stereotypical even though they were not.
Although not mentioned in my post, the speed-dating study found that women didn't seem to care about status/income, but I too was not so convinced that it means women don't care about income or status, given that male students at their own college have probably already met some basic standard (they're in college) and future earnings are hard to predict. He saw practitioners of the social sciences mainly as lackeys of technologically-minded natural scientists, bent on reducing individual freedom and moral accountability to mere epiphenomena of natural processes (See Lewis 19 b). But she would like to bring some studies to their attention.
And most gender differences in personality are a lot smaller than gender differences in height. Reprinted in God in the Dock: Essays on Theology and Ethics, ed. She is a biologist and geneticist at Brown Univetsity and she thoroughly debunks these claims about testosterone levels and aggressive behavior and a whole lot of other sexist,racist claims made by both women and men scientists.
I don't have a link to this article because I can't find it online anymore. There are, it turns out, virtually no large, consistent sex differences in any psychological traits and behaviors, even when we consider the usual stereotypical suspects: that men are more aggressive, or just, or rational than women, and women are more empathic, verbal, or nurturing than men. In another study, mothers estimated how steep a slope their 11-month-olds could crawl down.
When differences are found, they are always average—not absolute—differences. Moms of boys got it right to within one degree; moms of girls underestimated what their daughters could do by nine degrees, even though there are no differences in the motor skills of infant boys and girls.
Biblical religion is quite uninterested in any discussion of God’s masculinity or femininity... Marching through the claims like Sherman through Georgia, she explains that assertions of innate sex differences in the brain are either "blatantly false," "cherry-picked from single studies," or "extrapolated from rodent research" without being confirmed in people.
Scripture does not depict God either as ontologically masculine or feminine. For instance, the idea that the band of fibers connecting the right and left brain is larger in women,supposedly supporting their more "holistic" thinking, is based on a single 1982 study of only 14 brains.